Law Minister Asaduzzaman vows to ensure smooth trial of July atrocities
"Those [judges] who feel that their salary is insufficient to support their family, or that this income does not meet their needs, do not need to continue in this profession," he says.
Law, Justice, and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Md Asaduzzaman today (18 February) said the trial of crimes against humanity related to the atrocities committed in the 2024 July Uprising will continue at a normal pace.
The dignity of those who sacrificed their lives in the July Uprising to establish democracy will be preserved, the minister made the remarks upon joining his ministry this afternoon.
Senior officials, including secretaries of the two divisions, welcomed the minister at the ministry.
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
"We will make every effort to strengthen the country's democracy on the solid foundation envisioned by the uprising," he added.
Md Asaduzzaman also said joining the office brings great joy, but this role requires a strong sense of responsibility.
Responding to reporters, he said, "We want this ministry to operate as per the people's expectations."
'Integrity is inherent in the word judge; no one will get away with corruption'
Md Asaduzzaman also said that integrity is inseparable from the very meaning of the word "judge," warning that no one will be spared if found involved in corruption.
Speaking at the introductory meeting with officials, he said, "If anyone engages in corruption, we will not only take administrative action but also file a corruption case. Anyone who believes they can engage in corruption and escape consequences will not be spared."
Referring to public discourse about "corrupt judges" and "corrupt officials," the minister said such labels should not define the judiciary. "A judge inherently means an honest judge. There is no separate definition of an honest judge."
Emphasising accountability, Asaduzzaman said, "Those [judges] who feel that their salary is insufficient to support their family, or that this income does not meet their needs, do not need to continue in this profession.
"They may practise law instead, as they have the opportunity to return to advocacy after retirement. This is my common message."
