US can’t let Russia create a sphere of influence | The Business Standard
Skip to main content
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • Subscribe
    • Epaper
    • GOVT. Ad
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Saturday
July 12, 2025

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • Subscribe
    • Epaper
    • GOVT. Ad
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
SATURDAY, JULY 12, 2025
US can’t let Russia create a sphere of influence

Politics

Hal Brands, Bloomberg
19 February, 2022, 08:05 pm
Last modified: 19 February, 2022, 08:08 pm

Related News

  • Trump tariff on Brazilian goods could jack up US burger price
  • Trump puts 35% tariff on Canada, eyes 15%-20% tariffs for others
  • 35% tariff: Commerce adviser meets US trade representative in Washington
  • Tariff implications: What does Trump actually want to achieve?
  • What Hitler’s tariff policy misfire can teach the modern world

US can’t let Russia create a sphere of influence

The Ukraine crisis strikes at the heart of a 200-year-old pillar of American foreign policy

Hal Brands, Bloomberg
19 February, 2022, 08:05 pm
Last modified: 19 February, 2022, 08:08 pm
US can’t let Russia create a sphere of influence

The current showdown between Russia and the West is deeply perplexing to many critics of American foreign policy. Why, they ask, doesn't the US simply accede to some of Russian President Vladimir Putin's demands — acknowledge that Ukraine will never join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and accept a Russian sphere of influence in the former Soviet Union?

The answer is more deeply rooted in American history than many observers might realize. For better or worse, US policy has long been characterized by opposition to hostile spheres of influence. That project reached triumphant heights during the post-Cold War era, but is being tested severely today.  

For much of recorded history, spheres of influence have been a normal part of global affairs. Great powers typically try to carve out privileged domains as a way of controlling events near their borders and keeping threats at bay.

The Business Standard Google News Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel

America is no exception: It gradually kicked the European powers out of the Caribbean and Latin America on its way to superpower status. "The United States is practically sovereign on this continent," Secretary of State Richard Olney declared in 1895, "and its fiat is law upon the subjects to which it confines its interposition."

Yet the US had a different attitude toward other countries' spheres of influence. In the 1800s and early 1900s, US officials aimed to prevent China from being sliced and diced by foreign powers. In World War I, Washington fought to prevent Imperial Germany from dominating territories running from Eastern Europe to the English Channel. In World War II, the US fought to prevent Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan from seizing domains vaster still.

Even during the Cold War, America challenged the Soviet bloc in Eastern Europe: While the use of force was off the table, Washington used covert action, information warfare and other means to undermine Moscow's control.

This hostility to spheres of influence owed to several of America's most prominent diplomatic traits. The desire for markets and resources in foreign nations led Americans to fear the economic consequences of a divided world. An interest in democracy and human rights didn't always lead the US to behave nobly in its own neighborhood, but it did make Americans squeamish about tolerating authoritarian control of other regions.

From a strategic viewpoint, US planners worried that powerful rivals would use regional spheres of influence as springboards to global aggression. Not least, America's sense of exceptionalism — its conviction that the US used power more benevolently than other states — eased any guilt over the apparent hypocrisy of denying to others what America claimed for itself.

America's anti-spheres project climaxed after the Cold War. The Soviet bloc was no more. Washington possessed such massive economic and military advantages, along with a global network of allies, that it could prevent even large countries from extending their grasp over nations next door.

To prove the point, the Pentagon dispatched two aircraft carriers in 1996 to prevent China from menacing Taiwan. The US also expanded NATO into Eastern Europe to hedge against the creation of a reinvigorated Russian empire. None other than Joe Biden, then Barack Obama's vice president, declared in 2009 that "we will not — will not — recognize any nation having a sphere of influence."

Biden is certainly right that the US benefits from a sphere-less world. Much of the world, for that matter, seems to agree: It is remarkable that so many countries, from US allies in the Pacific to the Baltic states and others in Europe, are willing to court America's influence to avoid being coerced by rivals closer to home.

This backstory also helps explain why the US is unwilling to close NATO's door to Ukraine and grant Moscow veto power over the geopolitical choices of its neighbors. That would represent a return to the darker, more dangerous world US officials have long worked to overcome.

Yet what seemed relatively easy at the height of America's post-Cold War predominance looks dramatically harder today. Putin's Russia has redeveloped the military capability to subjugate Ukraine and other nonaligned states on its borders. Putin has undertaken efforts, over the space of 15 years, to reassert Russia's regional primacy, even by invading countries such as Georgia that resisted its influence.

Today, the Russian ruler is essentially threatening to destroy Ukraine rather than allow it to chart its own geopolitical destiny.

The US, in turn, has promised to impose massive economic and diplomatic costs on Putin if he follows through on this threat, perhaps not physically thwarting an invasion of Ukraine but making it unprofitable and unrepeatable. That effort, as I wrote last week, is likely to lead to a tense, protracted clash between Washington and Moscow, featuring ongoing coercion and the potential for escalation in Eastern Europe and beyond.

America's determination to deny Russia an autocratic sphere of influence is now running head-on into Putin's determination to create one. Which means that the costs and risks associated with this time-honored aspect of US policy are about to go up.

Top News / World+Biz / USA

USA / USA foreign policy / Russia / Ukraine / Russia-Ukraine tensions / Russia / Russia military drills / Russia and Ukraine millitary drill / Russia invasion fear / Russia-Ukraine conflict

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Representational image
    In addition to 35% tariff, US demands 40% local value addition for 'Made in Bangladesh' goods
  • Kunming rising: China's emerging healthcare hub draws Bangladeshi patients
    Kunming rising: China's emerging healthcare hub draws Bangladeshi patients
  • Photo: Courtesy
    4 arrested, 2 remanded over brutal killing of trader near Mitford Hospital

MOST VIEWED

  • In terms of stream of education, girls maintained their excellence as well. Photo: TBS
    SSC 2025: Girls dominate boys by over 5%
  • Photo: Mohammad Minhaj Uddin/TBS
    SSC, equivalent results: Pass rate drops to 68.45%, GPA-5 also declines
  • The overall pass rate across all boards this year, 68.45%, is significantly lower than last year's. Photo: Focus Bangla
    SSC 2025: Rajshahi board records highest pass rate, Barishal lowest
  • How S Alam’s Global Islami Bank cooked Tk2,259cr loss into Tk128cr profit
    How S Alam’s Global Islami Bank cooked Tk2,259cr loss into Tk128cr profit
  • Representational image. Photo: TBS
    SSC 2025: 73.63% pass rate among technical students, 68.09% at Madrasahs
  • Economist Abul Barkat; Photo: Courtesy
    Economist Abul Barkat arrested in graft case

Related News

  • Trump tariff on Brazilian goods could jack up US burger price
  • Trump puts 35% tariff on Canada, eyes 15%-20% tariffs for others
  • 35% tariff: Commerce adviser meets US trade representative in Washington
  • Tariff implications: What does Trump actually want to achieve?
  • What Hitler’s tariff policy misfire can teach the modern world

Features

Kunming rising: China's emerging healthcare hub draws Bangladeshi patients

Kunming rising: China's emerging healthcare hub draws Bangladeshi patients

12h | Panorama
Photo: Collected/BBC

What Hitler’s tariff policy misfire can teach the modern world

1d | The Big Picture
Illustration: TBS

Behind closed doors: Why women in Bangladesh stay in abusive marriages

1d | Panorama
Purbachl’s 144-acre Sal forest is an essential part of the area’s biodiversity. Within it, 128 species of plants and 74 species of animals — many of them endangered — have been identified. Photo: Syed Zakir Hossain/TBS

A forest saved: Inside the restoration of Purbachal's last Sal grove

1d | Panorama

More Videos from TBS

Renowned economist Abul Barkat imprisoned

Renowned economist Abul Barkat imprisoned

10h | TBS Today
All of Iran's uranium still intact, Israel claims

All of Iran's uranium still intact, Israel claims

10h | TBS World
Trump-Netanyahu in new strategy on Gaza issue

Trump-Netanyahu in new strategy on Gaza issue

12h | TBS World
Shocking science: why birds stay safe on electricity lines

Shocking science: why birds stay safe on electricity lines

12h | TBS Stories
EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Advertisement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2025
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net