NCP alleges BNP involved in violence against rival candidates and female supporters, urges govt action

The National Citizens' Party (NCP) today (2 February) accused the BNP of orchestrating violence against opposing candidates and female supporters, intimidating voters, and misusing state institutions in the run-up to the national elections.

In a press briefing at the party's central temporary office in Banglamotor today, NCP Joint Secretary Akram Hossain CF alleged that under Tarique Rahman's leadership, the BNP has become involved in attacks on women and political opponents, posing long-term risks to the country. He called on the government to ensure the safety of thousands of women participating in campaign activities nationwide.

The NCP detailed multiple incidents of planned disruptions against its candidates. In Dhaka, banners and billboards were torn down; in Natore-3, an NCP candidate's office was attacked by a motorcycle gang of BNP workers, leaving at least five injured. Similar incidents were reported in Noakhali-6, involving physical assaults, vandalism, and threats to voters. The party also alleged that state agencies failed to act, despite prior knowledge of risks.

The party also criticised the High Court's granting of anticipatory bail to 40 BNP suspects, including a candidate in the Maulana Rezaul Karim murder case, saying it could embolden further threats to public safety. The NCP demanded immediate action to stop violence, ensure administrative neutrality, and investigate all alleged misconduct, warning that the ongoing situation threatens a free, fair, and impartial election in Bangladesh.

NCP further claimed that BNP activists are spreading misleading messages about the upcoming referendum, portraying a "Yes" vote as anti-Islamic and against the Liberation War.

Adding to these allegations, the party expressed concern over Bangladesh Bank, which reportedly sought sensitive information about farmers eligible for loan forgiveness following BNP's campaign promise of up to Tk10,000 relief. NCP said this request lacked formal approval and could unfairly benefit a political party, undermining the neutrality of a key state institution.