US Quits WHO: A Global Health Shockwave
America has officially left the World Health Organization and the ripple effects are already being felt worldwide. In this video, we break down what the US exit really means, why it may have violated American law, and how a sudden funding gap could weaken the world's ability to detect and fight the next pandemic.
From budget cuts and staff layoffs at the WHO to fears of slower outbreak responses, the consequences go far beyond politics. Experts warn this move could reshape global health leadership, shift influence toward rival powers, and leave vulnerable countries exposed.
Is this a strategic reset or a dangerous gamble? And what does it mean for Americans when the next global health emergency hits? Watch to understand the real stakes behind this historic decision.
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
FAQ
Q: Why did the US leave the WHO?
A: The Trump administration argued the WHO failed during COVID and claimed the organization is biased and inefficient.
Q: Is this move legal under US law
A: US law requires a one-year notice and payment of outstanding dues. Critics say those steps were not fully met.
Q: How much money did the US provide
A: The US contributed about 18% of the WHO budget, making it the largest donor.
Q: Will this effect Americans
A: Yes. The WHO helps track outbreaks worldwide. Slower detection abroad can mean faster spread at home.
Q: Who fills the gap now?
A: Other countries and private donors may step in, but experts warn China and other powers could gain influence.
Q: Does this weaken pandemic readiness?
A: Many health experts say yes. Coordination, data sharing, and emergency response could become slower and more fragmented.
