Why criminalising ‘sexual intercourse with promise of marriage’ is a misstep | The Business Standard
Skip to main content
  • Latest
  • Epaper
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Wednesday
June 18, 2025

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Latest
  • Epaper
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 2025
Why criminalising ‘sexual intercourse with promise of marriage’ is a misstep

Thoughts

Makshudul Alom Mokul Mondal
03 April, 2025, 06:40 pm
Last modified: 03 April, 2025, 06:49 pm

Related News

  • HC questions legality of criminalising sex on false promise of marriage
  • Sarjis Alam ties the knot
  • Student-based platform demands abolishing marriage tax imposed by AL govt
  • Sohel Taj ties the knot
  • 'Not married yet,' says Tahsan

Why criminalising ‘sexual intercourse with promise of marriage’ is a misstep

While intended to protect women from deception, the law risks blurring the lines between fraud and personal choice, creating a legal minefield with far-reaching consequences

Makshudul Alom Mokul Mondal
03 April, 2025, 06:40 pm
Last modified: 03 April, 2025, 06:49 pm
Illustration: TBS
Illustration: TBS

The recent approval of the draft amendment to the Women and Children Repression Prevention Act, which criminalises illicit sexual intercourse under the promise of marriage with a maximum punishment of seven years, raises significant legal and ethical concerns.

While the law appears to be designed to protect women from deception, it risks creating a host of unintended consequences — legal ambiguities, wrongful convictions and an undue intrusion into private affairs.

Blurring the lines between deception and consent

The Business Standard Google News Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel

At the core of this amendment is the assumption that a broken promise of marriage is equivalent to criminal fraud. 

However, relationships are inherently unpredictable, and many engagements or romantic commitments end for legitimate reasons — changing circumstances, incompatibility or mutual agreement. Criminalising failed relationships opens the door to selective prosecution, making the judicial system a mediator of romantic disputes rather than a guardian of justice.

The law, if enacted, will provide an easy mechanism for personal retaliation. Failed relationships often end in emotional distress, and this law could be misused by individuals seeking revenge, financial settlements or coercion. A former partner could file a complaint out of spite, forcing the accused to endure a lengthy and costly legal battle, even if there was no actual deception.

Unlike clear-cut cases of sexual violence, these cases hinge on subjective interpretations of intent. 

How does a court determine whether an individual truly intended to marry at the time of intercourse? Should personal text messages, private conversations or witness testimonies from friends and family serve as legal evidence? Such grey areas make prosecution highly uncertain, increasing the likelihood of arbitrary or biased legal outcomes.

Legal ambiguities: An unworkable standard of proof

A fundamental principle of criminal law is that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. However, proving that a person never had the intent to marry at the time of intercourse is nearly impossible. 

The prosecution would need to establish that a clear promise of marriage was made; that the promise was insincere or fraudulent at the time; and that the promise directly influenced the act of intercourse.

The challenge lies in distinguishing between a genuine change of heart and an intentional act of deception. People enter relationships with good intentions, but circumstances change. 

Moreover, these cases may rely on the testimony of the alleged victim alone, creating a situation where convictions could be based solely on one person's word against another's. 

In the absence of physical evidence, how can justice be fairly administered? This could lead to wrongful convictions, where individuals may be punished based on circumstantial or unprovable claims.

Weaponising the law: A tool for personal vendettas

The law, if enacted, will provide an easy mechanism for personal retaliation. Failed relationships often end in emotional distress, and this law could be misused by individuals seeking revenge, financial settlements or coercion. A former partner could file a complaint out of spite, forcing the accused to endure a lengthy and costly legal battle, even if there was no actual deception.

Furthermore, such laws disproportionately affect men, as they create a presumption of guilt in cases where there is little tangible evidence. This raises concerns about the fairness of legal proceedings and the potential for the law to be exploited for ulterior motives, including blackmail and extortion.

Intrusion into private affairs: Policing personal relationships

This amendment sets a dangerous precedent by allowing the state to interfere in consensual relationships. It risks transforming private interactions between adults into matters of criminal law, shifting the focus from consent to morality-based governance. 

In a modern, rights-based legal framework, the state should not have the authority to police adult relationships unless coercion or violence is involved.

The implications of such legal overreach extend beyond individual cases. It could lead to an atmosphere of fear and hesitation in relationships, where individuals become wary of expressing romantic intent due to the potential legal repercussions.

Judicial overload: A flood of unprovable cases

Bangladesh's judicial system is already overburdened, with thousands of unresolved cases pending in courts. By adding another vaguely defined criminal offence, this law could flood the system with cases that are inherently difficult to prove, diverting attention from more urgent matters such as rape, domestic violence, and trafficking.

Courts should be focused on prosecuting clear cases of violence and coercion, not getting entangled in assessing the sincerity of past romantic commitments. This law risks turning judges into arbiters of personal relationships rather than defenders of justice.

Misplaced legal priorities

Bangladesh faces urgent gender-related issues, including domestic violence, workplace harassment, forced marriage, and trafficking. Instead of strengthening legal frameworks to address these pressing problems, the government is prioritising a law that is not practical.

Existing laws already cover cases where coercion, fraud, or force is used to obtain sexual consent. If a person is forced, tricked, or manipulated into intercourse under threats or intimidation, those crimes should be prosecuted under established statutes. 

Creating a separate offence based on broken promises of marriage serves little legal purpose beyond complicating personal relationships.

What is needed

The proposed amendment to criminalise 'illicit sexual intercourse with the promise of marriage' is a deeply flawed legal proposal. It introduces legal ambiguities that are difficult—if not impossible — to fairly adjudicate, opens the door to wrongful convictions and malicious prosecutions, and represents an overreach of state power into private affairs.

Instead of criminalising personal relationships, Bangladesh should invest in legal reforms that truly empower and protect women. 

Justice should be rooted in fairness, clarity and practicality — not in laws that seek to police romantic commitments.

Clarification: Not an endorsement of sex outside marriage

Opposing this amendment does not mean endorsing sex outside marriage. Many, including myself, believe such relationships should align with moral, religious and social values. 

However, the legal system exists to ensure justice, not enforce personal morality. The key issue is whether criminal law should regulate private, consensual relationships without causing severe injustices.

Sketch: TBS
Sketch: TBS

Makshudul Alom Mokul Mondal is a public policy and advocacy specialist with over a decade of experience.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of The Business Standard

Marriage / deception

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Logo of Beximco Group. Photo: Collected
    Beximco defaults €33m in Germany, Deshbandhu owes Czech bank €4m
  • Soldiers salute Arakan Army chief Major General Twan Mrat Naing during a parade in Myanmar, 6 April 2018. File Photo: Arakan Army deputy chief Brig Gen Nyo Twan Awng/Twitter
    Rohingya militant groups recruit from camps to fight Arakan Army, warns Crisis Group
  • The India-Bangladesh integrated checkpost in Fulbari. Photo: Passang Yolmo via Telegraph India
    Import of boulders from Bhutan to Bangladesh stopped by Indian transporters in Fulbari

MOST VIEWED

  • Infograph: TBS
    Govt to ease loan rules to help foreign firms expand in Bangladesh
  • A view of Iranian missiles across the sky as seen by Biman pilot Enam Talukder. Photo: Enam Talukder
    Biman pilot witnessed Iran's missiles flying towards Israel
  • Infographics: Duniya Jahan/TBS
    How Israel's secret nuclear arsenal comes under spotlight amid attacks on Iran
  • Infograph:TBS
    Overseas employment back in flow as Saudi recruitment picks up in May
  • Google Pay. Photo: Collected
    Google Pay coming to Bangladesh next week
  • European Council President Antonio Costa, Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, US President Donald Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen pose for a family photo during the G7 Summit, in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, June 16, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/Pool
    G7 expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability

Related News

  • HC questions legality of criminalising sex on false promise of marriage
  • Sarjis Alam ties the knot
  • Student-based platform demands abolishing marriage tax imposed by AL govt
  • Sohel Taj ties the knot
  • 'Not married yet,' says Tahsan

Features

The Kallyanpur Canal is burdened with more than 600,000 kilograms of waste every month. Photo: Courtesy

Kallyanpur canal project shows how to combat plastic pollution in Dhaka

16h | Panorama
The GLS600 overall has a curvaceous nature, with seamless blends across every panel. PHOTO: Arfin Kazi

Mercedes Maybach GLS600: Definitive Luxury

2d | Wheels
Renowned authors Imdadul Haque Milon, Mohit Kamal, and poet–children’s writer Rashed Rouf seen at Current Book Centre, alongside the store's proprietor, Shahin. Photo: Collected

From ‘Screen and Culture’ to ‘Current Book House’: Chattogram’s oldest surviving bookstore

2d | Panorama
Photos: Collected

Kurtis that make a great office wear

4d | Mode

More Videos from TBS

Khamenei declares war on Israel

Khamenei declares war on Israel

57m | TBS News Updates
What's behind the animosity between former allies Iran and Israel?

What's behind the animosity between former allies Iran and Israel?

12h | Others
21 Muslim countries condemn Israeli attack on Iran

21 Muslim countries condemn Israeli attack on Iran

12h | TBS World
News of The Day, 17 JUNE 2025

News of The Day, 17 JUNE 2025

14h | TBS News of the day
EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Advertisement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2025
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net