Space, hype, and reality: Is the SpaceX crash a bargain or a trap?
Friday, on 24 July 2026, showed signs of stabilising after its initial correction. The stock opened the session at $116.00, reached an intra¬day high of $117.00, and tested its bottom at $111.40, before finally settling at a closing price of $115.07. This close marks a staggering 47.2% plunge from its June peak.
The recent market debut of SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) has been nothing short of a financial rollercoaster. In a flash, the stock rallied from its $135 offer price to an astronomical high of $225.64, before plunging to a
$110.85 low in a heartbeat.
Friday, on 24 July 2026, showed signs of stabilising after its initial correction. The stock opened the session at $116.00, reached an intra¬day high of $117.00, and tested its bottom at $111.40, before finally settling at a closing price of $115.07. This close marks a staggering 47.2% plunge from its June peak.
While long-term investors are debating whether this correction represents "natural justice" or a prime buying opportunity, two massive technical and fundamental forces are driving the narrative: the baseline valuation of Starlink's cash flows, a looming institutional lock-up expiration, and an intense battle with Wall Street short-sellers.
The $1.1 trillion wipeout and the short-seller triumph
Having observed equity market listings for decades, I find the sheer velocity of this capital destruction unprecedented. At its peak on 16 June 2026, intense retail and institutional hype drove NASDAQ: SPCX to an all-time high market capitalisation of approximately $2.66 trillion. However, based on the $115.07 closing price on 24 July 2026, the company's market capitalisation has compressed to roughly $1.51 trillion to $1.53 trillion.
Within just a couple of weeks, SpaceX has seen an astonishing $1.11 trillion erased from its market value.
This rapid decline has left short-sellers highly profitable and deeply satisfied with the stock's downward trajectory, netting them an estimated $15.5 billion in paper profits. Short interest recently swelled to a massive 32% of the publicly tradable float. This aggressive bearish positioning prompted a fierce response from Elon Musk, who used his social media platform, X, to deliver a direct warning: firms betting against SpaceX face a "very low" probability of long-term survival, echoing his historic battles against Tesla shorts.
Starlink's cash flow: The anchor of inherent valuation
A company cannot survive indefinitely on a valuation driven purely by narrative and social media warfare. Fortunately for SpaceX, the company possesses a robust fundamental engine that differentiates it from pure speculative tech listings: Starlink.
According to the latest prospectus data, Starlink has emerged as the definitive commercial anchor for the entire entity:
The Revenue Engine: Starlink generated roughly $11.4 billion in revenue, driving an impressive 61% of total group revenues.
The Profit Dynamic: While the launch infrastructure and secondary divisions continue to burn massive amounts of capital, Starlink's operating income expanded significantly, boasting margins approaching 39%.
The valuation influence
Starlink's high operating margin and sticky subscription-based revenue stream act as a vital safety floor for the stock price. In typical Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) discounted cash flow (DCF) models, analysts separate the rocket launching business from the connectivity business. Starlink's standalone cash flow profile justifies a baseline valuation of $400 billion to $500 billion even under conservative market scenarios.
When the stock trades at $115.07, it implies a total group valuation near
$1.51 trillion. For this baseline valuation to hold, Starlink must continue its aggressive subscriber scaling to offset the massive capital expenditure (CapEx) required for deep-space exploration and constellation maintenance. Without Starlink's recurring consumer and enterprise service cash flows, the overall SpaceX valuation framework would collapse under the weight of its capital-intensive projects.
Understanding the Lock-Up Unlock Timelines Risk
Beyond the active short-sellers, shareholders are facing two critical regulatory milestones that present significant structural risks to market liquidity:
The 90-day lock-up expiry risk (Early September 2026):
Shareholders must wait for this first major window to open. This timeline often releases restrictions on early employees, select inside partners, and minor shareholders. While it represents a smaller percentage of the overall float, it will serve as the market's first test of insider selling pressure. If these individuals rush to liquidate, it could trigger a minor supply shock.
The full 180-day lock-up expiry risk (Early December 2026):
This is the definitive technical hurdle. After waiting the full six months, major institutional venture capital firms, corporate founders, and heavyweights will finally be permitted to liquidate their substantial blocks of stock on the open market. The risk here is immense: if even a fraction of these massive positions are dumped simultaneously, buying demand could be entirely overwhelmed, depressing the stock price significantly.
Historical precedents: The mega-IPO volatility pattern
The early post-IPO turbulence seen in SPCX is a classic characteristic of highly anticipated mega-listings. We have seen this script play out before with historical giants like Meta (formerly Facebook) and Alibaba:
1. Meta (Facebook) — The 2012 debut disappointment
When Facebook went public in May 2012 at $38 per share, it faced severe valuation skepticism. Within a few months, the stock plummeted over 50% to a low near $17.55. Much like SPCX, early critics called it overvalued. However, once the initial dust settled and institutional lock-ups cleared, the company's underlying fundamentals took over, eventually turning it into a tech pillar.
2. Alibaba — The 2014 supply shock
Alibaba's 2014 debut priced at $68, soared past $90 on its first day, and peaked near $120 later that year. However, when its massive 180-day lock-up period expired in early 2015, a colossal wave of insider supply hit the market. This supply shock dragged the stock down below its initial listing high, bottoming out near $57 later in 2015 before finding a long¬term baseline.
The Bottom Line
For a stock that briefly crossed a $2.66 trillion valuation, the current price action reflects a market shifting away from pure hype and toward realistic fundamentals. History shows us that early volatility is not necessarily a death sentence for a company with strong structural value.
However, until the market successfully navigates the initial 90-day and full 180-day lock-up unlock timelines risk, alongside a highly motivated short-seller cohort, SPCX remains a high-stakes battleground. Long-term bulls may view $115.07 as a deep discount anchored by Starlink's cash generation, but conservative traders should brace for short-term technical turbulence.
Ahmed Iqbal Hasan is the Former Chairman and Former President of the Dhaka Stock Exchange
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of The Business Standard. The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Trading stocks and IPOs involves significant risk, and you should always conduct your own research or consult with a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
