Bangladesh 2.0 requires a review of the constitution | The Business Standard
Skip to main content
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Thursday
June 12, 2025

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
THURSDAY, JUNE 12, 2025
Bangladesh 2.0 requires a review of the constitution

Thoughts

Waseem Alim
15 August, 2024, 04:55 pm
Last modified: 15 August, 2024, 05:13 pm

Related News

  • UK crime agency now freezes assets of ex-land minister Saifuzzaman: AJ
  • Dhaka South conducts key meetings at Wasa Bhaban as Nagar Bhaban remains locked
  • British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds meets CA Yunus
  • 7 children and teens drown in separate incidents across 5 districts
  • Dhaka South to double insecticide spraying to prevent Aedes

Bangladesh 2.0 requires a review of the constitution

We need to start deliberations and understand the long-term cyclical implications of preserving our current Constitution. A country that keeps running into constitutional crises every decade cannot be expected to have a rule of law

Waseem Alim
15 August, 2024, 04:55 pm
Last modified: 15 August, 2024, 05:13 pm
The transition of power in Bangladesh is never orderly because the ruling side has too much to lose. Photo: Rajib Dhar
The transition of power in Bangladesh is never orderly because the ruling side has too much to lose. Photo: Rajib Dhar

As a nation, we have just realised the perils of concentrating power in one person. Before we forget the lessons of July 2024, it is important to revisit the foundations of our republic. Unfortunately, our constitutional framework leads the country towards regimes with autocratic tendencies. In just 52 years, this document has failed us multiple times.

The original Bangladeshi Constitution, drafted in 1972, drew inspiration from the Indian and Pakistani constitutions, which were, in turn, roughly based on the British parliamentary system. There was also a strong influence of socialism, owing to the prevailing doctrines of the time and our kinship with the USSR. Back then, the internet had not yet been invented, the Berlin Wall was still standing, and command economies were very much in fashion.

The protection of individual liberties in the original draft was an afterthought. Despite the promised protections in our Constitution, every government in the history of Bangladesh has infringed upon the basic rights of citizens, usually under the pretext of national security and/or communal harmony. In order to truly secure our rights, a much deeper change is needed in the structure of governance.

Our Constitution turns politics into a zero-sum game and compels the winning party to use the government machinery to extend its power ad infinitum—until a revolution of some kind disrupts the process, and we restart from square one with a new government. The transition of power is never orderly because the ruling side has too much to lose. As the Chinese proverb goes, "He who rides a tiger is afraid to dismount."

The Business Standard Google News Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel

The average citizen pays dearly during times of transition. We lose lives, disrupt economic progress, and destroy the environment in which our children are growing up. Such a process seems barbaric in the 21st century and should not be allowed to continue.

The root of the problem lies in concentrating all powers in the hands of the legislative body—the Jatiya Sangsad. This issue is exacerbated by Article 70 of the Constitution, which prevents members of parliament (MPs) from defecting or voting against their own party.

Effectively, this gives total control to the ruling party leadership. Our MPs play a minimal role in the legislative process—their individual role in parliament is somewhat ceremonial. As a country, we lose out because our legislative body does not thoroughly review the details of the laws being proposed.

Even when a party comes to power with a marginal majority, they use the government  machinery to benefit their candidates and actively attempt to increase their seats in Sangsad. The ruling party strategically dominates by diverting or depriving resources from various constituencies. They rightfully play for absolute power, and the end justifies their means—however nefarious those means may be.

The losing sides try to defend their positions, but over time, their resources and willpower are depleted. They have to wait for an external force to step in and clean up before regular politics can resume again.

To stop this cycle from repeating, we must make it impossible to gain absolute power. It is in the national interest to design a foolproof system of checks and balances that distributes power among various branches of the government and other institutions.

We have the advantage of studying political systems from around the world and how they have evolved. In India, for example, the multiple state governments have been effective at restricting the power of the central government. In the UK, the monarchy acts as a natural check against absolute power. For most of the UK's democratic history, the monarch had the prerogative to dissolve parliament.

Bangladesh is geographically too small to be divided into even smaller states—and we have not inherited a state-based system to begin with. On the other hand, it is now unfashionable to set up a hereditary monarchy like in the UK, Saudi Arabia, or Japan—and the anti-establishment, free-spirited Bangladeshi mindset makes it extremely risky for anyone trying to set up such a regime. In light of the current political context led by Gen-Z students and a world where freedom of expression is cherished, we could look towards the rather resilient US system.

We should keep a few principles in mind once we embark on this journey of reviewing the Constitution:

Separation of the Executive Branch: The responsibility of the executive branch is to implement the laws of the country and to run the day-to-day operations of the government. The Prime Minister or other ministers should not be members of parliament, nor should they be selected by a parliamentary majority. There should be separate nationwide elections for Prime Minister, allowing voters to judge the merits of each candidate.

Members of Parliament (MPs) should be primarily responsible for deliberating on the laws of the country. It should be their full-time job to formulate legislation and understand public opinion. Their constituency should not expect the MP to drive development—that is the responsibility of the executive branch and local government.

MPs should not be constrained by their political party and must be allowed to vote independently. To prevent further damage, Article 70 of the Constitution must be abolished.

Term Limit for Prime Minister: The role of PM is extremely demanding, and it is wrong to burden a single person beyond a certain period. The realisation that their term is limited should lead to more balanced decisions and reduce the fear of dismounting. Additionally, term limits will keep entrenched interests and sycophants in check. A limited term will also give hope to voters, as change is guaranteed, and should reduce the urge to revolt.

Constitutional amendments should be made more rigid. Even if a political party is able to gain control of both the legislative and executive branches, there must be additional thresholds to effect any change in the Constitution.

Most importantly, we must remember that the Constitution is a document to protect the rights of citizens and carefully create checks and balances at every stage: appointment of justices, powers of the president, legislative overreach, internet blackouts, etc.

Certain readers may argue that a constitutional change is beyond the scope of an interim government. However, we must realise that no elected government, in its right mind, will ever want to change the system that puts them in power. The interim government is perhaps our best hope to bring about this fundamental change. Such an action could be supported by a public referendum.

A full-scale review of the Constitution is well beyond the scope of this article and the capacity of its author. However, we do need to start deliberations and understand the long-term cyclical implications of preserving our current Constitution. A country that keeps running into constitutional crises every decade cannot be expected to have a rule of law.

We need a sensible way out of our zero-sum politics—one that also protects the losers of the political games. To get out of violent politics, the powers of government must be distributed, and we must be vigilant in protecting the rights of citizens. We want no Caesars at all.


Waseem Alim. Sketch: TBS
Waseem Alim. Sketch: TBS

Waseem Alim is the founder of Chaldal.com


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of The Business Standard

Bangladesh / Constitution

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Keir Starmer declines to meet CA Yunus: FT report
    Keir Starmer declines to meet CA Yunus: FT report
  • Saifuzzaman Chowdhury. Photo: Collected
    UK crime agency now freezes assets of ex-land minister Saifuzzaman: AJ
  • Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus speaks at the Chatham House in London on 11 June 2025. Photo: CA Press Wing
    No desire to be part of next elected govt: CA Yunus

MOST VIEWED

  • File photo of ex-prime minister Sheikh Hasina and her son Sajeeb Wazed Joy. Photo: Collected
    Joy spends Eid with Hasina in India: Indian media
  • Infofgraphics: TBS
    DGHS issues 11-point directive to prevent spread of Covid-19 in Bangladesh
  • Saifuzzaman Chowdhury. Photo: Collected
    UK crime agency now freezes assets of ex-land minister Saifuzzaman: AJ
  • File photo of BNP Standing Committee Member Amir Khasru Mahmud Chowdhury. Photo: Collected
    Khasru flies to London ahead of Yunus-Tarique meeting
  • Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus speaks at the Chatham House in London on 11 June 2025. Photo: CA Press Wing
    No desire to be part of next elected govt: CA Yunus
  • Illustration: Khandaker Abidur Rahman/TBS
    Three hospitals ‘held hostage’ as discharged July uprising injured keep occupying beds

Related News

  • UK crime agency now freezes assets of ex-land minister Saifuzzaman: AJ
  • Dhaka South conducts key meetings at Wasa Bhaban as Nagar Bhaban remains locked
  • British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds meets CA Yunus
  • 7 children and teens drown in separate incidents across 5 districts
  • Dhaka South to double insecticide spraying to prevent Aedes

Features

Among pet birds in the country, lovebirds are the most common, and they are also the most numerous in the haat. Photo: Junayet Rashel

Where feathers meet fortune: How a small pigeon stall became Dhaka’s premiere bird market

14h | Panorama
Illustration: Duniya Jahan/ TBS

Forget Katy Perry, here’s Bangladesh’s Ruthba Yasmin shooting for the moon

1d | Features
File photo of Eid holidaymakers returning to the capital from their country homes/Rajib Dhar

Dhaka: The city we never want to return to, but always do

2d | Features
Photo collage shows political posters in Bagerhat. Photos: Jannatul Naym Pieal

From Sheikh Dynasty to sibling rivalry: Bagerhat signals a turning tide in local politics

4d | Bangladesh

More Videos from TBS

Why is Omicron XBB more contagious?

Why is Omicron XBB more contagious?

10h | TBS Stories
What did Dr. Yunus say at the Chatham House Dialogue in London?

What did Dr. Yunus say at the Chatham House Dialogue in London?

11h | TBS Today
News of The Day, 11 JUNE 2025

News of The Day, 11 JUNE 2025

13h | TBS News of the day
WB predicts worst decade for global growth since 60s

WB predicts worst decade for global growth since 60s

14h | TBS Stories
EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Advertisement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2025
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net