Rethinking The Cloud-Capped Star through an industrial lens
Often viewed through the lens of Partition, ‘Meghe Dhaka Tara’ reveals a deeper, rarely explored critique of industrial society’s dehumanising grip on individual lives and dreams

'Meghe Dhaka Tara' is an astonishing film by Ritwik Ghatak and the first in his acclaimed Partition Trilogy. While the film is often viewed as a powerful portrayal of how the partition affected middle and lower-class Bangali families, a broader, more analytical perspective reveals another layer— the entire narrative is deeply intertwined with industrial concerns.
This article aims to re-examine 'Meghe Dhaka Tara' through the lens of industrial structures, production conditions, a viewpoint rarely explored in existing scholarship.
At the beginning of 'Meghe Dhaka Tara', we see the protagonist, Neeta, walking through an open field, surrounded by the beauty of nature. It is a quiet, peaceful morning, the kind of moment that reflects the calm and simplicity we all long for in everyday life.
This serenity, however, is suddenly disrupted by the sharp sound of a passing train. The train, symbolising industrial intrusion, cuts through the natural landscape, and its whistle shatters the silence.
In that moment, Ghatak subtly introduces the theme of industrial pressure; the whistle acts as a reminder that the day must be surrendered to labour, struggle, and the demands of a mechanised, relentless world. What begins as a scene of calm quickly turns into a powerful metaphor for how industry and forces disturb the rhythms of ordinary life.
Neeta, the sole breadwinner of her family, sacrifices her ambitions and dreams for the well-being of others. After her father's accident, she is forced to abandon her education, slowly losing her personal aspirations under the weight of familial and economic responsibility.
The film's title, 'Meghe Dhaka Tara' (The Cloud-Capped Star), takes on profound metaphorical weight. The "cloud" represents the oppressive fog of industrialism — of factories, companies, and economic systems that obscures the "star," which symbolises dreams, identity, and humanity. It symbolises our collective hopes and the possibility of a meaningful life, both of which are ultimately destroyed beneath the cloud of industrial oppression.
Over time, Neeta becomes increasingly alienated—not only from her own dreams, but also from her family and sense of self. Her transformation mirrors that of Gregor Samsa in Franz Kafka's 'The Metamorphosis'.
In Kafka's narrative, Gregor, turned into vermin, does not first question his physical transformation but instead worries about how he will continue supporting his family. This mindset, shaped by industrial values, reflects how economic duty overrides personal identity.
Neeta, like Gregor, is stripped of her humanity by a society that equates worth with productivity. Her psychological deterioration is poignantly captured in a scene where her own mother admits, "I have never understood you, in spite of you being my daughter."
In this moment, Neeta is no longer seen as a person with desires or individuality, but merely as a function—an embodiment of selfless labour in an unforgiving industrial system.
We are also introduced to Shankar, Neeta's elder brother, whose ambition is to become a classical singer. He is currently unemployed, and though he dedicates his mornings to vocal practice, there is a moment when he suddenly stops not out of fatigue, but from a growing awareness of his status as an "unproductive" individual in an industrial, work-driven society.
This internal conflict is mirrored in his social reality— Shankar faces humiliation and rejection not only from the outside world, such as a local shopkeeper, but also from within his own family — his mother and younger brother included. Through Shankar, Ghatak critiques a system that marginalises creativity and spiritual ambition in favour of economic contribution.
Montu and Geeta, the younger brother and sister of Neeta, represent another facet of the film's critique of industrial society. Both are drawn toward superficial attractions and material desires — a symptom of the growing influence of consumer culture.
Montu, once engaged in education and sports, eventually abandons both to take up a labour job. His shift from personal growth to economic survival highlights how industrial structures compel individuals to prioritise productivity over personal development.
Sanat, Neeta's lover, is portrayed as an educated young man who has completed his graduation and aspires to pursue higher academic work through a thesis. Job opportunities come his way, yet he initially rejects them, choosing instead to follow his intellectual ambitions.
However, as the film progresses, we witness his eventual surrender to the pressures of industrial society. Despite his dreams, Sanat is ultimately forced to abandon his studies and accept a job, symbolising how even the most determined individuals are not immune to the demands of a system that values economic contribution over intellectual or artistic fulfilment.
Neeta's father's mix of Bangali and English reflects the lasting impact of colonialism, which Ghatak uses as a metaphor for how colonial influence continues to shape the mindset and values of industrial society.
Neeta's mother serves as a striking representation of the values upheld by industrial society. Her decision to marry off her younger daughter before Neeta—because Neeta is the family's primary earner.
One particular scene captures this dynamic with striking symbolism—Neeta and Sanat are seen speaking privately in a room, while her mother watches from outside. In this moment, Ghatak overlays the scene with the diegetic sound of cooking and a visual layer of kitchen smoke or fog. This is not incidental.
The cooking sound metaphorically suggests that the mother is "cooking up" a plan to disrupt the romantic relationship, while the fog serves as a visual symbol of the industrial societies.
Through these subtle cinematic choices, Ghatak critiques a world where emotional bonds are undermined by a system driven by survival, betrayal, and calculated self-interest.
In the final scene of 'Meghe Dhaka Tara', Neeta now terminally ill with tuberculosis—resides in a sanatorium nestled in the hills. Only her brother Shankar comes to visit. He informs her that everything is now settled at home—the family is doing well, and their house has even gained a second storey.
Yet Neeta does not respond to this with comfort or satisfaction. Instead, her ears—metaphorically fogged by the "cloud" of industrial burden. Her haunting response, "Dada, I really did want to live," stands as the emotional and philosophical climax of the film.
Neeta is alive, yet devoid of life — a living embodiment of death caused not by illness alone, but by a society that exploits and abandons those who serve it most.
The film's title, 'Meghe Dhaka Tara' (The Cloud-Capped Star), takes on profound metaphorical weight in this context. The "cloud" represents the oppressive fog of industrialism — of factories, companies, and economic systems that obscures the "star," which symbolises Neeta's dreams, identity, and humanity.
This star also symbolises our collective hopes and the possibility of a meaningful life, both of which are ultimately destroyed beneath the cloud of industrial oppression.
The writer is a student of Sociology at Bangladesh University of Professionals