HRFB urges review of provisions in proposed gambling, betting law
The rights body warns that some provisions in the draft legislation could allow excessive surveillance, weaken judicial oversight and undermine citizens’ constitutional protections.
The Human Rights Forum Bangladesh (HRFB) has urged the government to review several provisions of the proposed Gambling and Betting Prevention Act (Online and Offline) 2026, saying some clauses could undermine constitutional rights and judicial safeguards.
In a statement issued on 9 June, the organisation welcomed the government's move to formulate a law to curb online and offline gambling and betting-related crimes.
However, HRFB expressed concern over Sections 39(1) and 39(2), which would allow authorised officials to search digital devices, collect information, seize property and make arrests based on "belief" or "suspicion".
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
The organisation said the provisions lack adequate judicial oversight and accountability mechanisms, raising risks of surveillance and abuse of power.
HRFB also objected to proposals allowing the National Security Intelligence (NSI) and the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) to exercise powers related to investigation, search and arrest under the law.
It said granting such powers without proper judicial safeguards could deepen public concern, particularly given past allegations of enforced disappearances and human rights violations involving such agencies.
The rights body further raised concerns over provisions empowering mobile courts, saying they should not replace full judicial proceedings or limit an accused person's right to a fair hearing.
HRFB said while regulating gambling and betting is necessary, the law should not create opportunities for intrusive surveillance or misuse of authority.
The organisation called on the government to revise or remove the contentious provisions before placing the draft law before parliament.
It also urged authorities to hold consultations with legal experts, technology specialists, media representatives and civil society members to ensure the law complies with constitutional and human rights standards.
