From tension to ballots: Security, trust and the future after election 2026
Heavy security, political restraint and cautious optimism defined Bangladesh’s latest election, but the real test lies in how peace is sustained after the ballots are counted
Bangladesh has just witnessed its historic 13th National Parliamentary Election. Weeks of intense campaigning by political parties were accompanied by rallies, protests, occasional clashes between rival supporters and allegations of intimidation — creating a volatile political environment that raised concerns about security ahead of polling day.
Previous elections in 2014, 2018 and 2024 experienced varying levels of violence, contestation and political boycotts, illustrating how deep political polarisation can spill into the streets and erode perceptions of legitimacy. The 2026 electoral context reflected similar structural pressures, including mistrust among political actors and fears of voter disengagement. These dynamics made the task of maintaining law and order more complex and underscored the need for proactive security planning.
Operationally, the election presented enormous logistical demands. Voting took place in more than 42,000 polling centres nationwide across 299 constituencies, requiring careful coordination, manpower and risk-based deployment strategies.
Security arrangements involved multiple agencies working together with a combination of personnel and technology — including CCTV surveillance, enhanced monitoring and visible patrols — to deter violence and ensure accountability. Large-scale deployments and strong coordination were intended to reassure voters and maintain order throughout the electoral process.
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
Despite widespread deployment, there were isolated incidents of sporadic violence, intra-party clashes and allegations of irregularities. However, authorities responded swiftly to contain disturbances and prevent escalation. Intelligence-led operations before polling helped identify potential flashpoints, remove illegal weapons and disrupt organised networks that could threaten security. Increased patrols and visible law-enforcement presence contributed to an overall controlled environment that encouraged voter participation.
While security measures were important, they alone did not define the electoral environment. Political dialogue and public commitments by major actors to maintain peaceful conduct played a role in lowering tensions. Domestic and international observer missions also enhanced transparency and helped reassure citizens about the credibility of the process.
Another factor shaping the relatively calm atmosphere was the role of responsible political messaging, media coverage and civil society engagement. Public awareness campaigns encouraging peaceful participation and critical evaluation of online information helped counter rumours and misinformation that could have inflamed tensions.
Polling was conducted nationwide on 12 February from morning until afternoon, with voting generally proceeding without major disruption, despite isolated incidents in a few areas. Early turnout reports showed steady participation throughout the day, with strong voter enthusiasm noted by election officials and observers.
A smooth post-election transition will be essential to maintaining stability and preventing renewed unrest.
Many voters described the atmosphere as festive, and for a significant number of citizens this election represented an opportunity to exercise their voting rights with renewed confidence. Reports from several districts indicated substantial turnout levels and a broadly peaceful voting environment compared to earlier contentious polls.
Bangladesh now stands at a pivotal moment. The management of post-election security risks and political tensions will shape public confidence in democratic governance for years to come. After a turbulent political period, this election carries the potential to mark a new chapter — one defined by stability, accountability and renewed public trust.
Yet the casting of ballots is only the first stage of a democratic process. Political parties must demonstrate maturity by respecting outcomes and pursuing grievances through institutional channels rather than street confrontation. A smooth post-election transition and responsible political conduct will be essential to maintaining stability and preventing renewed unrest.
The days ahead will test the resilience of Bangladesh's institutions. Sustaining democratic gains will require disciplined security management, responsible leadership, vigilant media coverage and active citizen engagement. If these elements align, Bangladesh has the opportunity to show that democratic processes can prevail even amid uncertainty and political transition.
Mustafa Kamal Rusho, a retired Brigadier General, is a Research Director at the Osmani Centre for Peace and Security Studies.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Business Standard.
