Why Would Russia Attack a Nuclear Power Plant? | The Business Standard
Skip to main content
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Saturday
June 14, 2025

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
SATURDAY, JUNE 14, 2025
Why Would Russia Attack a Nuclear Power Plant?

Panorama

Tyler Cowen, Bloomberg
06 March, 2022, 03:00 pm
Last modified: 06 March, 2022, 03:08 pm

Related News

  • Israeli strikes back Iran's leadership into a corner
  • How an escalating Iran-Israel conflict could impact Bangladesh
  • Why are Iran and Israel sworn enemies?
  • Ukraine says wants to end war with Russia 'this year'
  • Russia's latest drone strikes hit Kyiv, maternity ward in Odesa, says Ukraine

Why Would Russia Attack a Nuclear Power Plant?

Decoding Putin’s war strategies could either be done applying the Game Theory or they are simply there as preemptive strike

Tyler Cowen, Bloomberg
06 March, 2022, 03:00 pm
Last modified: 06 March, 2022, 03:08 pm
The Russian attack suggests that Russia has stopped trying to win the global propaganda war. Photo: Bloomberg
The Russian attack suggests that Russia has stopped trying to win the global propaganda war. Photo: Bloomberg

Russia's shelling of the Ukrainian site of Zaporizhzhia, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, shows that the war in Ukraine is rapidly growing more complex and uncertain — but how we arrive at this conclusion is as important as the conclusion itself.

In other words, as I sometimes like to say: Time for some game theory. Specifically, how game theory might apply to nuclear conflict.

Start with the basic logic of deterrence and mutual assured destruction. Russian President Vladimir Putin knows that if he uses nuclear weapons against a NATO or EU member, Ukraine, or even a third country, he will invite a real risk of comparable retaliation. The degree of retaliation is uncertain, perhaps depending on the target. But he does not wish to bear that risk.

The Business Standard Google News Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel

Still, Putin would like to find a way of making nuclear threats without quite incurring the liability from … making nuclear threats.

Entre nuclear power plants. When Russian forces attack the plant, there is some chance that something goes wrong, such as a radiation spill. But more likely than not, the plant will hold up, and most dangerous processes can be shut down and the very worst outcomes avoided. You can think of Putin as choosing a "nuclear radiation deployment" with only some small probability.

Why might he do this? Well, he is showing that the use of broader nuclear deployments is not out of the question. He is also showing that he is willing to take a huge risk.

Most of all, he does not have much  to fear retaliation. The Western powers cannot know if these nuclear attacks are deliberate strategy or simply an accident of tactics in the field, and so — if only for that reason — they will not respond with a major escalation. If Russian forces moved on Estonia, they might be courting a very serious NATO response. But not in this situation.

You don't have to believe that Putin sat in his lair rubbing his hands as he dreamed up this diabolical strategy. It's also possible that the attack on the nuclear power plant started by mistake, or was ordered by lower-level commanders. Putin then simply allowed it to continue, perhaps out of a general love of chaos. At the very least, he did not consider it a priority to stop the attack.

Game theory doesn't always have to be about explicit plans and intentions. It also can help explain why "invisible hand" mechanisms lead people to a particular point in the strategy tree, as if they had those strategies as conscious intentions.

Attacking the nuclear power plant also illuminates some other parts of game theory. Ukraine and its people are taking very heavy losses and are hoping for NATO to intervene on their behalf. If the conflict seems riskier to all of Europe, and not just Ukraine, the odds of such intervention improve.

In this sense, the attack on the nuclear power plant does not have to be entirely bad for Ukrainian prospects in the war. The Ukrainian leadership is rightly horrified by this attack, due to the risks for Ukrainian citizens. But the attack could also mobilise European public opinion on behalf of military intervention for Ukraine. If the war greatly increases chances for the spread of dangerous nuclear radiation, then the likelihood that Germany, France, Turkey and other nations will intervene also greatly increases.

Notice, however, that the Russian position here may be sounder than it at first appears. European citizens care more about radiation in Ukraine than do American citizens, for reasons of simple proximity. Putin may realise he can put Europeans at greater risk so long as he doesn't provoke an intervention from the U.S. military, which would probably be decisive. It is a risky strategy that he might just get away with.

If you are the Ukrainian government, your incentive is to make the nuclear power plant attack sound as risky and precarious as possible. Indeed, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has done exactly that.

The Russian attack also suggests that Russia has stopped trying to win the global propaganda war. Might that herald further Russian atrocities?

I don't think game theory can predict exactly what is coming next. But it is helpful in identifying general patterns and why one side might choose or continue a particular strategy. And right now pretty much all the indicators for this conflict, whether from the news or from game theory, are pointing very strongly negative.


Tyler Cowen. Illustration: TBS
Tyler Cowen. Illustration: TBS

Author's bio: Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University

Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Bloomberg, and is published by special syndication arrangement.
 

Features / Top News / World+Biz

Russia-Ukraine Crisis / Ukraine crisis / Nuclear Power plant / missile attack / war

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Missiles launched from Iran are intercepted as seen from Tel Aviv. REUTERS/Jamal Awad
    Iran fires missiles at Israel in response to attacks; Trump says it's not too late for nuclear deal
  • Logo of National Citizen Party (NCP)
    People won't accept election date before July Charter is implemented: NCP on Yunus-Tarique meeting
  • Yunus-Tarique meeting: Jamaat says outcome positive for democracy, IAB says dispelled uncertainty from politics
    Yunus-Tarique meeting: Jamaat says outcome positive for democracy, IAB says dispelled uncertainty from politics

MOST VIEWED

  • Wreckage of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner showing part of its registration "VT-ANB" in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave
    Air India Dreamliner crashes into Ahmedabad college hostel, kills over 290
  • File Photo of Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus: UNB
    Prof Yunus to receive Harmony Award from King Charles today
  • Energy adviser Fouzul Kabir Khan with other government officials during a visit to Sylhet gas field on 13 June 2025. Photo: TBS
    I would disconnect gas supply to every home in Dhaka if I could: Energy adviser
  • Bangladesh Bank Governor Ahsan H Mansur. TBS Sketch
    Bangladesh mulls settlements with tycoons over offshore wealth: BB governor tells FT
  • UCB declares no dividend for 2024 to comply with regulatory requirement
    UCB declares no dividend for 2024 to comply with regulatory requirement
  • UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus
    Disclosure of unconfirmed Yunus-Starmer meeting shows ‘diplomatic imprudence’: Analysts

Related News

  • Israeli strikes back Iran's leadership into a corner
  • How an escalating Iran-Israel conflict could impact Bangladesh
  • Why are Iran and Israel sworn enemies?
  • Ukraine says wants to end war with Russia 'this year'
  • Russia's latest drone strikes hit Kyiv, maternity ward in Odesa, says Ukraine

Features

Photos: Collected

Kurtis that make a great office wear

13h | Mode
Among pet birds in the country, lovebirds are the most common, and they are also the most numerous in the haat. Photo: Junayet Rashel

Where feathers meet fortune: How a small pigeon stall became Dhaka’s premiere bird market

2d | Panorama
Illustration: Duniya Jahan/ TBS

Forget Katy Perry, here’s Bangladesh’s Ruthba Yasmin shooting for the moon

3d | Features
File photo of Eid holidaymakers returning to the capital from their country homes/Rajib Dhar

Dhaka: The city we never want to return to, but always do

4d | Features

More Videos from TBS

No Cash in ATMs: System Glitch or Something Deeper?

No Cash in ATMs: System Glitch or Something Deeper?

7h | TBS Today
Iran-Israel military power; who is ahead?

Iran-Israel military power; who is ahead?

9h | TBS World
Did the possibility of an Iran nuclear deal set back after the attack?

Did the possibility of an Iran nuclear deal set back after the attack?

11h | TBS World
IRGC chief Major General Hossein Salami killed in Israeli strike

IRGC chief Major General Hossein Salami killed in Israeli strike

12h | TBS World
EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Advertisement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2025
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net