US foreign policy in 2025 | The Business Standard
Skip to main content
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Friday
June 13, 2025

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Latest
  • Economy
    • Banking
    • Stocks
    • Industry
    • Analysis
    • Bazaar
    • RMG
    • Corporates
    • Aviation
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 2025
US foreign policy in 2025

Panorama

Joseph S Nye, Jr/Academic 
08 September, 2024, 08:45 pm
Last modified: 08 September, 2024, 08:54 pm

Related News

  • Alien Enemies Act: The wartime law Trump is using to justify deportations
  • Trump says again he’ll set unilateral tariffs in two weeks
  • Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect
  • Los Angeles police order protesters in downtown to go home
  • Trump says Musk relationship over, warns of 'serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

US foreign policy in 2025

While much is at stake in this year’s US presidential election, there will be large areas of continuity in US foreign policy no matter who wins. But the differences between the candidates’ attitudes toward alliances and multilateralism are significant – and that could make all the difference 

Joseph S Nye, Jr/Academic 
08 September, 2024, 08:45 pm
Last modified: 08 September, 2024, 08:54 pm
Both Trump and Harris have pledged to increase American hard power – militarily and economically. Photo: Bloomberg 
Both Trump and Harris have pledged to increase American hard power – militarily and economically. Photo: Bloomberg 

As the US presidential election draws near, many are wondering what it will mean for American foreign policy. The answer is wrapped in uncertainty.

First, who will win the election? At the beginning of the summer, polls showed Donald Trump well ahead of President Joe Biden. But now that Vice President Kamala Harris has become the Democratic Party candidate, polls show her with a slight lead. The problem, of course, is that if voter sentiments can swing so quickly, predicting where they will lie on November 5 is all but impossible. While Harris has demonstrated impressive political skill, democratic politics is full of surprises. 

Second, foreign leaders and actors also have a "vote," in the sense that their behaviour can suddenly change the US agenda and the probabilities of various outcomes. The modest foreign policy that George W. Bush outlined during his 2000 campaign was nothing like the policy that he pursued after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Who knows what kind of surprise Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping might have in store.

The Business Standard Google News Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel

Campaign statements do provide some hints about policy, of course. If Harris wins, one can expect a continuation of Biden's policy, albeit with some adjustments. She seems to place less emphasis on promoting democracy – one of Biden's biggest themes – and she says a bit more about Palestinian rights. Generally, though, she would pursue the same policy of reinforcing US alliances and promoting multilateralism.

Trump is more unpredictable. While all politicians stretch the truth, he is notorious in this regard. It is difficult to know which statements might become policy. His rhetoric about unilateralism and downgrading alliances and multilateral institutions tells us something about the tenor of his foreign policy, but it does not answer questions about specific issues.

Observers often try to improve their predictions by looking at the candidates' advisers. Harris's top foreign-policy hand is Philip Gordon, a pragmatic, highly respected centrist who handled European and the Middle Eastern affairs in prior Democratic administrations before becoming the vice president's chief foreign-policy adviser.

By contrast, it is difficult to identify a comparable figure in the Trump camp – though the press sometimes mentions Robert O'Brien, Trump's last national-security adviser. What we do know is that Trump regrets having appointed traditional Republicans to key roles during his previous term, since they duly curtailed his freedom of action and made his policies more moderate than he wished.

It is also worth noting some similarities between the two candidates. Most important are their positions on China. There is now a broad bipartisan consensus that China has not played fair on trade and intellectual-property issues, and that its assertive behaviour in the East and South China Seas is threatening American allies like Japan and the Philippines. 

China has said many times that it would not rule out the use of force in seizing Taiwan, which it regards as a renegade province. In many ways, Biden continued Trump's China policy, and Harris would likely do the same, with some adjustments.

A second similarity between the candidates is their rejection of neoliberal economic policies. During Trump's presidency, the US abandoned the traditional (Reagan-era) Republican approach to trade, increased tariffs, and downgraded participation in the World Trade Organization. This was all done under the guidance of US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, who remains influential in Trump's circle.

Trump also spurned the Trans-Pacific Partnership that Barack Obama had negotiated, and Biden then did nothing to rejoin that agreement or to remove Trump's tariffs on imports from China. In fact, Biden went further by introducing new technology-focused export controls against China (billed as erecting a "high fence around a small yard"). With her own ties to the US tech industry as a Californian, Harris is unlikely to lower the fence. And Trump, if anything, will expand the yard.

Moreover, both Trump and Harris have pledged to increase American hard power – militarily and economically – through investments in the defence budget and the defence industrial base. Both also can be expected to continue the current nuclear-weapons modernization program, and to promote the development of new weapons that use artificial intelligence.

One of the biggest differences concerns the candidates' positions on Europe. Trump and his running mate, J.D. Vance, have made it clear that they have little interest in supporting Ukraine and NATO. Trump claims that he would end the war quickly through negotiations, and it is difficult to see how this could be done without weakening Ukraine dramatically.

In the Middle East, both candidates have pledged to maintain Israel's security and its right to self-defence, though Harris also speaks of a Palestinian right to self-determination. Both probably would urge Saudi Arabia to proceed with normalising relations with Israel, and both would take a tough line on Iran. But whereas Trump assigns low priorities to Africa and Latin America, Harris could be expected to pay more attention to those regions. 

The most dramatic difference concerns American soft power: the ability to secure desired outcomes through persuasion rather than coercion or payment. During his presidency, Trump opted for an "America First" unilateralism that led other countries to conclude that their interests were not being considered. He also openly rejected multilateralism, most dramatically by withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement and the World Health Organization. 

Biden reversed those moves, but Trump would probably reverse the reversal, whereas Harris would maintain American participation. She also would be more likely than Trump to issue statements promoting human rights and democracy.

In short, there will be large areas of continuity in US foreign policy no matter who wins the election. But the differences between the candidates' attitudes toward alliances and multilateralism are significant – and that could make all the difference. 

Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Co-Chair of the Aspen Strategy Group, is a former dean of the Harvard Kennedy School, a former US assistant secretary of defence, and the author, most recently, of A Life in the American Century (Polity Press, 2024).

Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Project Syndicate, and is published by special syndication arrangement.

Donald Trump / Kamala Harris / Joe Biden / Panorama

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Infographics: TBS
    Lengthy legal road ahead to repatriate Saifuzzaman's wealth from UK
  • From fact-checker to fact-checked: CA Press Wing’s turn in the hot seat
    From fact-checker to fact-checked: CA Press Wing’s turn in the hot seat
  • Wreckage of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner showing part of its registration "VT-ANB" in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave
    Air India Dreamliner crashes into Ahmedabad college hostel, kills over 290

MOST VIEWED

  • Keir Starmer declines to meet CA Yunus: FT report
    Keir Starmer declines to meet CA Yunus: FT report
  • Wreckage of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner showing part of its registration "VT-ANB" in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave
    Air India Dreamliner crashes into Ahmedabad college hostel, kills over 290
  • Saifuzzaman Chowdhury. Photo: Collected
    UK crime agency now freezes assets of ex-land minister Saifuzzaman: AJ
  • File Photo of Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus: UNB
    Prof Yunus to receive Harmony Award from King Charles today
  • Infofgraphics: TBS
    DGHS issues 11-point directive to prevent spread of Covid-19 in Bangladesh
  • Bangladesh Bank Governor Ahsan H Mansur. TBS Sketch
    Bangladesh mulls settlements with tycoons over offshore wealth: BB governor tells FT

Related News

  • Alien Enemies Act: The wartime law Trump is using to justify deportations
  • Trump says again he’ll set unilateral tariffs in two weeks
  • Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect
  • Los Angeles police order protesters in downtown to go home
  • Trump says Musk relationship over, warns of 'serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

Features

Among pet birds in the country, lovebirds are the most common, and they are also the most numerous in the haat. Photo: Junayet Rashel

Where feathers meet fortune: How a small pigeon stall became Dhaka’s premiere bird market

1d | Panorama
Illustration: Duniya Jahan/ TBS

Forget Katy Perry, here’s Bangladesh’s Ruthba Yasmin shooting for the moon

2d | Features
File photo of Eid holidaymakers returning to the capital from their country homes/Rajib Dhar

Dhaka: The city we never want to return to, but always do

3d | Features
Photo collage shows political posters in Bagerhat. Photos: Jannatul Naym Pieal

From Sheikh Dynasty to sibling rivalry: Bagerhat signals a turning tide in local politics

5d | Bangladesh

More Videos from TBS

Banks' estimates were wrong: Bangladesh Bank spokesperson

Banks' estimates were wrong: Bangladesh Bank spokesperson

4h | Podcast
What exactly happened to the ill-fated Boeing aircraft?

What exactly happened to the ill-fated Boeing aircraft?

5h | TBS World
Govt to set up Debt Office as loan burden to hit Tk29 lakh cr by FY28

Govt to set up Debt Office as loan burden to hit Tk29 lakh cr by FY28

6h | TBS Insight
Curfew imposed for second night in Los Angeles

Curfew imposed for second night in Los Angeles

6h | TBS World
EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Advertisement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2025
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net