Indian govt gives Rs3.5cr for cancer research, probe finds university spent Rs1.92cr on cow dung, urine

An investigation into the Panchagavya Project at Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University has raised questions about the management of funds and implementation of the research initiative, according to an official report.

The project, launched in 2011, was funded by the Madhya Pradesh government to explore cancer treatments using "Panchagavya," a traditional mixture of cow dung, urine, and dairy products, says the Indian Express.

While the university had requested Rs 8 crore for the initiative, the state approved Rs 3.5 crore. The investigation, led by an Additional Collector, reviewed expenditures, project records, and physical assets, identifying several areas of concern.

Expenditures on materials and equipment

Between 2011 and 2018, the project reportedly spent approximately Rs 1.92 crore on basic materials such as cow dung, cow urine, storage vessels, and machinery. Investigators allege that the prevailing market cost for these materials should have been between Rs 15 lakh and Rs 20 lakh, suggesting a substantial inflation of expenses.

The report also highlighted Rs 15 lakh spent on furniture and electronic equipment, which investigators deemed unrelated to the project's stated goal of developing cancer treatments. In addition, approximately Rs 3.5 lakh was paid in labor costs, which was also flagged as non-essential by the investigation team.

Vehicle purchases and travel expenses

The inquiry identified a vehicle purchased for Rs 7.5 lakh that was not included in the original sanctioned estimate. Investigators noted that the vehicles allegedly acquired for the project were missing. Furthermore, the research team conducted 23 to 24 air trips to various cities, none of which were mentioned in the original project estimates. The investigation questioned both the necessity and propriety of these trips.

Implementation and training gaps

The project's stated objectives included providing training to farmers, but the investigation found no documentation verifying what training had been delivered. This raised concerns about whether the project's implementation aligned with its stated goals.

University response

University officials, including Registrar Dr. S.S. Tomar, have rejected the allegations. "The project operated with complete transparency, following government procurement rules and open tenders," he said. "The university has undergone proper auditing and continues to provide training to youth and farmers."

The investigation report has been submitted to the Collector and is expected to be reviewed by the Divisional Commissioner, who will determine any further administrative or financial action.