The crucial role of transparent environmental and social impact assessment reports in Bangladesh
Transparency of ESIA reports also enable well-informed and meaningful public participation and involvement, letting local people have their say and jointly make decisions
Several recent megaprojects in Bangladesh, such as the Rampal Power Plant and the Padma Bridge, have highlighted the weaknesses of existing Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) processes in Bangladesh and the need for greater transparency.
The Rampal Power Plant Project, for instance, is a coal plant located near the Sundarbans, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Critics argue that the ESIA report for this project underestimates potential environmental impacts such as air and water pollution and overlooks alternative power sources.
This case studies illustrate the critical importance of transparent ESIA reports in Bangladesh, particularly in the context of rapid industrialisation and infrastructure development.
Importance of transparent ESIA reports in sustainable development
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
In the context of sustainable development, there is a growing recognition among countries globally of the need for transparent ESIA reports. These appraisals are crucial for evaluating the potential environmental and social consequences of proposed projects. In Bangladesh, as rapid industrialisation and infrastructure projects emerge, the importance of comprehensive and transparent ESIA reports cannot be overstated.
Transparent ESIA reports are vital for informed and trustworthy decision-making, as the local community has the right to be informed. These studies provide an overall green description of projects, accounting for impacts on the environment, local communities, and cultural heritage. Transparency ensures that all stakeholders—community members, government agencies, investors, and other interest groups—have access to the information needed to assess a project's viability and manage potential risks.
Transparency in ESIA reports also enables well-informed and meaningful public participation. It allows local people to express their views and participate in decision-making processes. This participatory approach ensures that development initiatives address the actual needs and wishes of local residents, as projects are closely monitored by those directly affected.
Challenges in conducting ESIA reports in Bangladesh
Despite the importance of transparency, several challenges hinder the effective implementation of ESIA reports in Bangladesh.
One major challenge is the lack of comprehensive data and project inspection expertise for thorough assessments. Often, ESIA reports lack detailed analysis and fail to adequately address the environmental and social impacts of development projects. This lack of robust data and expertise can lead to inaccurate assessments and ultimately, poorly planned projects with unforeseen negative consequences.
Questions about the independence and impartiality of ESIA consultants also arise. Conflicts of interest, inadequate monitoring, and other issues can compromise the impartiality and reliability of the assessment process.
When consultants are not truly independent, there's a risk of biased or incomplete portrayals of the project's impact. This limited transparency leads to public distrust of ESIA findings and ultimately impairs the quality of regulatory decision-making.
Furthermore, the implementation and monitoring of ESIA guidelines in Bangladesh are inconsistent, with minimal consequences for violations. This lack of enforcement allows projects to proceed with little regard for their negative environmental and social implications. Communities can be adversely affected through increased waste, pollution, and job disruption, highlighting the need for stricter enforcement mechanisms.
Moving towards transparency and accountability
Improving the transparency and accountability of the ESIA process can help address these challenges. This multifaceted approach involves developing strong regulatory bodies, building the capacity of ESIA practitioners, and increasing public participation in the policymaking process.
Independent review mechanisms and robust monitoring systems must be established to ensure that ESIA regulations and standards are followed. These mechanisms would provide an objective assessment of the ESIA reports and identify any potential biases or shortcomings.
Civil society organisations, academia, and the media can play crucial roles in tracking the involvement of all stakeholders throughout the ESIA process. By holding all actors accountable, public trust in the system can be restored.
Transparent and accountable ESIA reports are essential instruments for sustainable development in Bangladesh. By increasing transparency, accountability, and public engagement in these evaluations, environmental degradation can be reduced, vulnerable communities can be protected, and a more inclusive economic growth path can be promoted.
The most crucial step for Bangladesh is to improve its ESIA processes in terms of transparency and accountability. Achieving this will help realise development targets, environmental goals, and the overall well-being of the people.
Farhan Aziz is working as a team lead for research and campaigns in an organisation named Lawyers for Energy, Environment, and Development (LEED).
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of The Business Standard.
