The US makes carbon pricing more complicated than it needs to be | The Business Standard
Skip to main content
  • Epaper
  • Economy
    • Aviation
    • Banking
    • Bazaar
    • Budget
    • Industry
    • NBR
    • RMG
    • Corporates
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • Subscribe
    • Epaper
    • GOVT. Ad
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Wednesday
May 28, 2025

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Epaper
  • Economy
    • Aviation
    • Banking
    • Bazaar
    • Budget
    • Industry
    • NBR
    • RMG
    • Corporates
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • Videos
    • TBS Today
    • TBS Stories
    • TBS World
    • News of the day
    • TBS Programs
    • Podcast
    • Editor's Pick
  • World+Biz
  • Features
    • Panorama
    • The Big Picture
    • Pursuit
    • Habitat
    • Thoughts
    • Splash
    • Mode
    • Tech
    • Explorer
    • Brands
    • In Focus
    • Book Review
    • Earth
    • Food
    • Luxury
    • Wheels
  • Subscribe
    • Epaper
    • GOVT. Ad
  • More
    • Sports
    • TBS Graduates
    • Bangladesh
    • Supplement
    • Infograph
    • Archive
    • Gallery
    • Long Read
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Magazine
    • Climate Change
    • Health
    • Cartoons
  • বাংলা
WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2025
The US makes carbon pricing more complicated than it needs to be

Panorama

Peter R. Orszag, Bloomberg
14 September, 2021, 01:45 pm
Last modified: 14 September, 2021, 01:51 pm

Related News

  • Touhid expresses concern over widespread rumour campaigns during meeting with USCIRF chair
  • Trump dumps Netanyahu
  • Bangladeshis in US may suffer as 5% tax proposed on sending remittances by non-citizens
  • Israeli strikes kill 146 Palestinians in Gaza in 24 hours, local health authorities say
  • Trump announces $14.5 billion Etihad commitment with Boeing, GE

The US makes carbon pricing more complicated than it needs to be

What happens when a country that's unwilling to impose a direct tax on emissions decides to assess the carbon content of imports? 

Peter R. Orszag, Bloomberg
14 September, 2021, 01:45 pm
Last modified: 14 September, 2021, 01:51 pm
One of the main reasons the US has been unable to impose a national carbon tax or permit trading system is skittishness over the potential political attacks it would bring. Photo: Bloomberg. 
One of the main reasons the US has been unable to impose a national carbon tax or permit trading system is skittishness over the potential political attacks it would bring. Photo: Bloomberg. 

As the November climate conference in Glasgow approaches, debate over the value of carbon "border adjustment" mechanisms in many countries is picking up. Most puzzling is a US approach proposed in Congress.

A border adjustment is a fee that a country would impose on the quantity of carbon embodied in imports. The idea is to mitigate "leakage" of emissions toward countries with looser climate policies, and encourage those countries to adopt stricter ones. Where countries differ in the stringency of their efforts to lower emissions, the mechanism can push toward lower emissions everywhere. And it can discourage counterproductive shifts in the location of polluting industries.

Europe is leading the way. Earlier this year, I suggested that the Europeans would move ahead despite international counterpressure, and that indeed is what's happening. The European mechanism has been fleshed out in the European Commission's "Fit for 55" agenda, which lays out a plan to reduce emissions 55% by 2030, compared with 1990 levels. The European strategy has raised many questions, including whether it is compatible with international trade rules — China argues it is not — and even whether it would do all that much in practice. A recent think tank report suggests it would have "negligible impacts" on trade.

The Business Standard Google News Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel

But I'd like to focus here on an even more extraordinary development, which is the idea that the US could impose its own border adjustment mechanism even though, unlike the European Union, it has no federal carbon price — no permit trading system or tax. To see why that's unusual, consider that the whole purpose of a border adjustment mechanism is to impose the same carbon price on goods produced abroad as on those produced domestically.

If a country sets its domestic carbon price at, say, $50 a ton, then the adjustment mechanism would impose a fee of $50 a ton on imported carbon (and typically also provide a rebate of $50 a ton on exported carbon). The objective is to level the playing field, so that producers abroad face the same incentives as local producers to reduce emissions. According to the EU, under its mechanism, "EU importers will buy carbon certificates corresponding to the carbon price that would have been paid, had the goods been produced under the EU's carbon pricing rules."

Even with a domestic price for carbon in place, a border adjustment can be challenging to carry out. It may be hard, for example, to identify with any precision how much carbon an import contains. But at least where there is a domestic carbon price, the intended size of the adjustment is clear.

It would thus be particularly unusual to impose a carbon fee at the border in the absence of any carbon price imposed domestically. Yet Senator Chris Coons of Delaware and Representative Scott Peters of California have proposed a US border adjustment mechanism.

William Pizer and Erin Campbell of Resources for the Future have outlined how this could work. The US would estimate the effects of other policies, apart from pricing, that affect carbon emissions. "Here, we bump into the particularly tricky issue with nonprice policies: prices are not observed," the authors note. "Nonetheless, there are several alternative solutions." Imagine, for example, a clean air standard for steel plants that requires lowering carbon emissions by a certain amount. An estimate of a price on carbon that could generate the same emissions reductions from steel — the implicit price that the regulation imposes — could then be the basis for a fee on imports.

Carrying out this approach would be even more complicated than in Europe. But it would have an odd political economy effect: It would indirectly reveal a carbon price for the US. That fact is worth highlighting, because a key reason the US has been unable to impose a national carbon tax or permit trading system is skittishness over the potential political attacks it would bring.

If we can handle revealing a carbon price through a border adjustment mechanism, why not just take the more direct route by setting a carbon price in the first place? A carbon price may not be the panacea it's sometimes presented as in Econ 101 discussions. And it's true that the U.S. can make significant progress toward reducing emissions without one. But the border adjustment mechanism illustrates how much more complicated we make things by being unwilling to simply and directly impose a price on carbon.


Peter R. Orszag is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is the chief executive officer of financial advisory at Lazard.


Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Bloomberg, and is published by special syndication arrangement.
 

Top News

US / carbon

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Inflation, exchange rate shocks to intensify fiscal pressure in FY26
    Inflation, exchange rate shocks to intensify fiscal pressure in FY26
  • Leaders and activists of BNP gather at Nayapaltan ahead of the rally of three BNP affiliated organisations on Wednesday, 28 May 2025. Photo: TBS
    BNP, Jamaat rallies: Traffic likely to clog Dhaka roads, including Shahbagh, Nayapaltan, Kakrail
  • File photo of jamaat leader ATM Azharul Islam
    Jamaat leader ATM Azharul walks out of jail after acquittal in war crimes case

MOST VIEWED

  • Selim RF Hussain. Sketch: TBS
    BRAC Bank MD Selim RF Hussain resigns
  • Bangladesh Bank Governor Ahsan H Mansur. TBS Sketch
    Depositors need not worry as govt will take over banks before merger: BB governor
  • Graphics: TBS
    Suspicious banking activities surge by 56% since July: Cenbank
  • Photo: Collected
    DU student assaulted for protesting eve-teasing at Chadni Chowk
  • Illustration: TBS
    Bangladesh sees highest-ever per capita income of $2,820 in FY25, BBS provisional data shows
  • Officials protest inside the Secretariat on Tuesday, 27 May 2025, over a government ordinance amending the Public Service Act, 2018. Photo: Rajib Dhar
    Protest at Secretariat suspended as govt assures decision on ordinance tomorrow

Related News

  • Touhid expresses concern over widespread rumour campaigns during meeting with USCIRF chair
  • Trump dumps Netanyahu
  • Bangladeshis in US may suffer as 5% tax proposed on sending remittances by non-citizens
  • Israeli strikes kill 146 Palestinians in Gaza in 24 hours, local health authorities say
  • Trump announces $14.5 billion Etihad commitment with Boeing, GE

Features

In recent years, the Gor-e-Shaheed Eidgah has emerged as a strong contender for the crown of the biggest Eid congregation in the country, having hosted 600,000 worshippers in 2017. Photo: TBS

Gor-e-Shaheed Boro Maath: The heart of Dinajpur

1d | Panorama
The Hili Land Port, officially opened in 1997 but with trade roots stretching back to before Partition, has grown into a cornerstone of bilateral commerce.

Dhaka-Delhi tensions ripple across Hili’s markets and livelihoods

2d | Panorama
Photo: Collected

Desk goals: Affordable ways to elevate your study setup

2d | Brands
Built on a diamond-type frame, the Hornet 2.0 is agile but grounded. PHOTO: Asif Chowdhury

Honda Hornet 2.0: Same spirit, upgraded sting

2d | Wheels

More Videos from TBS

How can we protect Dhaka’s rivers and canals from plastic waste?

How can we protect Dhaka’s rivers and canals from plastic waste?

1h | TBS Programs
Jamaat leader ATM Azhar released from prison after 13 years

Jamaat leader ATM Azhar released from prison after 13 years

1h | TBS Today
Trump delays 50% tariffs on EU goods

Trump delays 50% tariffs on EU goods

12h | Others
Eid may be celebrated in Bangladesh on June 7

Eid may be celebrated in Bangladesh on June 7

12h | TBS Today
EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Advertisement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2025
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net